When All Siberia began operations in 1998, the Russian business environment was just emerging from the chaos of the 1990s. Company registries were fragmented, and reliable information was scarce. Our early investigations relied heavily on local relationships and physical document retrieval — a visit to a regional Chamber of Commerce, a trusted contact at a notary office, or a conversation with a local lawyer who knew which government clerk to approach.
The 1990s: Information Scarcity and Personal Networks
In the immediate post-Soviet period, there was no centralised company register accessible to foreign investigators. Information was held by regional registration chambers, tax inspectorates, and notary offices — each operating independently with no interoperability. Verifying a company's ownership often meant sending someone physically to the relevant regional office and navigating a bureaucratic system not designed for transparency.
Ownership itself was frequently obscured. The rapid privatisation of the early 1990s created corporate structures that bore little resemblance to Western equivalents. Bearer shares, nominee arrangements, and informal ownership agreements were the norm rather than the exception. Due diligence in this era was as much about assessing personal reputation and local standing as it was about verifying documents.
The 2000s: Registry Reform and Growing Transparency
The introduction of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (EGRUL) in 2002 was a significant turning point. For the first time, basic company information — registration date, legal address, director, and statutory capital — could be accessed centrally, initially via tax inspectorate offices and later online. This dramatically improved the baseline of what could be verified remotely.
During the early 2000s, foreign investment into Russia accelerated, and the demand for professional due diligence grew accordingly. Many investors discovered that official EGRUL records did not always reflect the true ownership or operational reality of a business. Nominee directors served on hundreds of boards simultaneously. Registered addresses were mass-registration buildings housing thousands of shell entities. Due diligence firms like All Siberia played a critical role in bridging the gap between official records and ground truth.
The arbitration court system (Arbitrazh) also became an important intelligence source during this period. Publicly accessible online from around 2008, court decisions provided rich detail on company disputes, debt histories, and the identities of individuals involved in litigation — often revealing beneficial owners and financial relationships that no registry would disclose.
Post-2014: Sanctions, Opacity, and the New Environment
The 2014 geopolitical shift changed the landscape fundamentally. Sanctions imposed by the US, EU, and UK created new compliance obligations for international businesses dealing with Russian counterparties. At the same time, Russia began restricting access to certain databases previously available to foreign investigators, and the phenomenon of "de-offshorisation" pushed many beneficial owners to repatriate assets into domestic holding structures — sometimes making ownership more opaque, not less.
All Siberia adapted by enhancing our international open-source intelligence capabilities while maintaining the local networks and methodological depth built over the preceding decade. Our relocation outside Russia in 2014 gave us full independence to serve international clients without constraint.
Today: Layers of Complexity
More than 25 years after our founding, Russian corporate structures remain complex — but the tools available to investigate them have expanded considerably. Digital footprints, leaked databases, domain registrations, and social media provide investigative threads that simply did not exist in the 1990s. Our historical experience allows us to recognise patterns that newer entrants miss: the sudden change of director before a major deal, the registered address shared by hundreds of shell companies, the offshore chain that terminates in a jurisdiction favoured during a specific political era.
This accumulated knowledge — built through more than two decades of hands-on investigation — is what sets professional due diligence apart from automated database checks.
Need a due diligence investigation on a Russian or CIS entity? Request a report or email [email protected].